 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
45
numbers of the victims from the number of ours have preserved our nationality from
destruction.
Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder
our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. We execute Masons in such a
wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it, not even the victims
themselves of our death sentence, they all die when required as if from a normal kind of
illness. Knowing this, even the brotherhood in its turn dare not protest. By such methods
we have plucked out of the midst of Masonry the very root of protest against our disposition.
While preaching liberalism to the goyim we at the same time keep our own people and our
agents in a state of unquestioning submission.
Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim has been reduced to a minimum.
The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this
sphere.
In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions judges decide as we
dictate to them, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of
the goyim, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have
anything in common with them – by newspaper opinion or by other means. Even senators
and the high administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the goyim is
incapable of use for analysis and observation, and still more for the forseeing whither a
certain manner of setting a question may tend.
In this difference in capacity for thought between the goyim and ourselves may be clearly
discerned the seal of our position on the Chosen People and of our higher quality of
humanness, in contradiction to the brute mind of the goyim.
Their eyes are open, but see
nothing before them and do not invent (unless, perhaps, material things). From this it is
plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.
When comes the time of our overt rule, the time to manifest its blessings, we shall make all
legislatures, all our laws will be brief, plain, stable, without any kind of interpretations, so that
anyone will be in a position to know them perfectly. The main feature which will run right
through them is submission to orders, and this principle will be carried to a grandiose height.
Every abuse will then disappear in consequence of the responsibility of all down to the
lowest unit before the higher authority of the representative of power. Abuse of power
subordinate to this last instance will be so mercilessly punished that none will be found
anxious to try experiments with their own powers.
We shall fillip up jealously every action of
the administration on which depends the smooth running of the machinery of the State, for
slackness in this produces slackness everywhere; not a single case of illegality or abuse of
power will be left without exemplary punishment.
Concealment of guilt, connivance between those in the service of the administration – all
this kind of evil will disappear after the very first examples of severe punishment.
The
aureole of our power demands suitable, that is, cruel, punishments for the slightest
infringement, for the sake of gain, of its supreme prestige. The sufferer, though his
punishment may exceed his fault, will count as a soldier falling on the administrative field of
battle in the interest of authority, principle and law, which do not permit that any of those
who hold the reins of the public coach should turn aside from the public highway to their own
private paths. For example: our judges will know that whenever they feel disposed to plume
themselves on foolish clemency they are violating the law of justice which is instituted for the
exemplary edification of men by penalties for lapses and not for display of the spiritual
qualities of the judge. Such qualities it is proper to show in private life, but not in a public
square which is the educationary basis of human life.
Our legal staff will serve not beyond the age of 55, firstly because old men more obstinately
hold to prejudiced opinions, and are less capable of submitting to new directions, and
second because this will give us the possibility by this measure of securing elasticity in the
changing of staff, which will thus the more easily bend under our pressure; he who wishes to
