 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
180
“news” stories are propaganda items intended to further current World Order goals.
The
only variations permitted in the iron control over network TV news is the final item, with is a
“human interest” story.
It usually praises a child who has collected considerable sums of
money for UNICEF, or some other World Order operation.
For many months, the three “independent” networks have emphasized a hate campaign
against South Africa on their evening news presentations.
One could hardly believe that
they are attempting to “conquer” South Africa for the World Order, because the Rothschilds
and Oppenheimers won control of the rich South African gold and diamond fields in the Boer
War of 1899.
Today, DeBeers, the diamond monopoly, is operated by Oppenheimer and
the Rothschilds, as is the gold mining, exemplified by their ownership of the giant Anglo-
American Corp. of South Africa Ltd. Apparently, the parasites would like to exterminate the
Boer population of South Africa, which has lived there for three centuries, and replace it
entirely with black workers. Some observers might call this “genocide”. Each evening the
three networks outdo each other in their campaign of vilification of the white citizens of
South Africa.
The rioting and looting committed by the blacks, as well as the vicious
murders of their fellow blacks, are glossed over by the news reports as inevitable results of
“white oppression”. As usual, there is a more immediate benefit gained from this continuous
propaganda barrage.
The Rothschilds have profited enormously from currency speculations
in the rand, i.e. the South African “dollar”.
In a few months, they were able to drive the rand
down from a value of $1.35, to thirty-five to forty-five cents, selling short all the way. On
September 2, 1985, they ran it back up a full ten cents, from thirty-five to forty-five cents.
This might seem small change to non-investors, but it has paid off handsomely for the
speculators.
The fact that the network hate campaign continues unabated suggests that
there is still plenty of money to be made in the rand.
On July 31, 1985, the Chase Manhattan Bank announced it would not renew any loans to
South Africa. Businessweek, Aug. 12, 1985, reported that this threw South African business
into a panic.
The bankers then demanded that South Africa give blacks the vote.
Gavin
Relly, chairman of the giant Oppenheimer-Rothschild conglomerate, Anglo-American Corp.,
tried to force Botha’s government to accede to these demands. Botha refused. Relly then
went to Zambia to negotiate with the Communist-dominated African National Congress,
preparatory to turning South Africa over to them.
The similarity of the major networks evening “news” programs has given rise to a report that,
each day, a list of ten or twelve “acceptable” news stories is prepared by British Intelligence
in London for the networks, teletyped to Washington, where the CIA routinely approves it,
and is then delivered to the networks.
The “selectivity” of the broadcasters has never been
in doubt. Edith Efron, in The News Twisters, (Manor Books, N.Y. 1972) cites TV Guide’s
interview with David Brinkley, April 11, 1964, with Brinkley’s declaration that “News is what I
say it is. It’s something worth knowing by my standards.” This was merely vainglorious
boasting on Brinkley’s part, as he merely reads the news stories previously selected for him.
Efron concludes this important book, which was refused by all the major New York
publishers, as follows:
“The networks actively slanted their opinion coverage in favour of the black militants and
against U.S. policy on the Vietnam war.
“The networks largely avoided the issue of violent radicals.
“The networks actively favoured the Democratic candidate, Hubert Humphrey, for President
over his Republican opponent, Richard Nixon.”
Efron could not foresee in 1972 that, having lost the election to Nixon, the networks would
engage in a successful bid to negate the election and drive him from the White House
through their trumped up “Watergate” campaign.
It seems incredible that there are literally thousands of interesting and vital news items from
all over the world available to the networks’ evening “news” programs, and yet they are
